I have been getting some really spectacular feedback on this paper, much of it in email or other forms, or simply too long to be presented to good effect in comments. So I've made this additional section for posting extended responses from my readers. Thank you so much!
First of all, Sally and I got into a fantastic discussion about the Mariska Hargitay controversies and how they relate to this paper. The first part of it is here. I'd prefer to continue it below, so that page doesn't get too overburdened with lengthy comments.






projecting the closet
This in the context of our discussion about the many ways Mariska's persona (and how fans approach it) can be seen as parallel to/blurred with Olivia's. Sally also pointed out that, until Mariska's latest relationship/engagement became public, she was also an apparently single workaholic seemingly too busy with her career to focus on a relationship (like Olivia). And I'd like to also note that the fact that SVU is a highly realist drama ("ripped from the headlines" and all) encourages this sort of slippage. So (as Joe says elsewhere) the logic of the show suggests that one has to look beyond the obvious suspect or the obvious boyfriend.
I think your idea that fans are interpreting recent Mariska developments as "closeted behavior" is right on. And it intersects with another discussion I want to have. Because, while the proliferation of detective strategies may help explain why some fans are approaching Mariska's explicit sexuality and relationships with the same skepticism as Olivia's, it doesn't necessarily explain the level of anger and vitriol that have been in evidence in the course of this investigation. I guess I am going to have to do into a little background here, so I'm quoting from your site, Sally, regarding the April 2003 Conan interview that started it all (or download the clip):
I was trying to talk through the level of rage that this really quite groundbreaking and adorable exchange stimulated in some corners of fandom (see the "Debate Club" link above) with another friend of mine. And the only explanation I could come up with is that people have a lot of pent-up anger about the oppressive operation of the closet that they in essence projected onto Mariska. Some lesbian-identified fans are mad that Olivia's lesbianism isn't more openly representable, they are probably also mad about the effects of the closet in media and culture in general, and these comments seemed to tap into that. I think this could happen because Mariska framed her story within the very same Mariska/Olivia ambiguity that we've been remarking in fan discourses. She seemed exasperated, not so much with being taken for a lesbian, but with the various (gender-inflected) ways she alternately is and isn't taken for Olivia (e.g. "you're much thinner and prettier"). Within this framework, her attempt to disavow her own alleged lesbianism and at the same time perhaps retain/reclaim some of her association with her character is easily refigured as a denial of Olivia's lesbianism -- which, I'd assume, people were particularly pissed about. And then the Olivia closet reverberated back into a fantasmatic Mariska closet. Still sorting this out...